![]() ![]() While 4 is in the same universe it is basically sealed off from the other 2 with only easter egg, and small referances to past titles and events. Otherwise if you find you acutally like the game then play fallout 3 AND NV. Originally posted by Blue★BeatBreak:If you a new comer just stick with 4. ![]() and dont let any of these plebs tell you any different. So anotherwords, Play what you like, enjoy it. but they are bad mouthing it because they were waiting for the next FPS game and played FO4 out of boredom. Most of the negative reviews are by people who think their honest opinion matters. Most people will complain they couldnt 60fps on ultra, and they are using Intel HD500 graphics cards and a garbage cpu like a celeron D or a early amd cpu. for the game elements, mechanics, graphics, performance that everyone claimed about. Oxhorn goes into great detail of the lore itself which bethesda didnt care to do. the storyline and plot are garbage, the quests are mostly nonsensical noncanon based garbage, but if you watch youtube. Fallout 4, Great game mechanics, skyrim with guns to a degree. What black isles obsidian did with it made it in no way comparable to any previous or future titles unless they release another title, which is unlikely. ![]() Fallout NV is a side story, with that said, its a great game in its own right. What bethesda did with fo3 was nice, i got my copy 4 months before most of you.Collectors Edition and i was one of the original No Mutants Allowed members. ![]() Fallout 3, which rendition? van buren or bethesda? van bured was good for its time, very buggy but it was ahead of its time. Fallout 2 was better than tactics, because of the storyline, Fallout Tactics had great turnbased war mechanics that played much the same as Wasteland 2. With that said I am a long time Fallout fan, and i have to say Fallout 1 was garbage, just the storyline anyways. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |